The plots use the same equations as the calculators, evaluated at each sampled point. Physical applicability remains limited by the assumptions of each model.
Reference plasma state
Choose a preset or enter the fixed state used by both plotting tools.
integer
Ordering diagram
Characteristic-scale hierarchy
Logarithmic markers compare standard frequencies and spatial scales for the reference state. Their ordering may change with the selected plasma environment.
Characteristic frequenciesIon, hybrid, electron, and plasma frequencies
View numerical valuesCharacteristic lengthsShielding, gyroradius, and inertial scales
View numerical values
Controlled parameter sweep
Parameter-dependence explorer
Vary one input while all other state variables remain fixed. Up to three quantities from the same physical family share a common axis and unit.
View sampled data
Scientific use
These plots contain no smoothing, fitting, or interpolated physics. Curves connect direct evaluations of the implemented equations only for readability. A visually smooth trend does not establish model validity, identify a wave mode, or replace uncertainty analysis. Exported files record the displayed values and fixed state.
Development research workflow · WI_H1_SWE only
Wind interval workbench
Import a prepared local Wind CSV and its matching JSON sidecar, inspect exclusions and assumptions, then calculate the four supported proton quantities. Files stay in this browser until you download them.
1. Import prepared files
The optional evidence file enables only the density-fit component of proton inertial-length uncertainty when it matches the accepted CDF identity. It does not establish full measurement error.
Choose local files to begin.
2. Inspect source and quality control
Explicit source-column mapping
Rejected source rows
Declared processing and assumptions
H⁺ number density and fit_flag=10 only; rejected rows never enter a formula.
WI_H1_SWE co-reported GSE mean-field components stay paired to their proton spectrum. No independent H0 alignment is performed.
Wind trace and perpendicular speeds use Wtrace = √(2kTtrace/mp) and W⊥ = √(2kT⊥/mp) separately. Trace speed is never substituted for perpendicular speed.
Beta is proton beta; electron pressure for total beta is unavailable. Alfvén speed assumes proton-only mass density, not measured total composition.
Nominal 92-second support is declared; exact per-spectrum endpoints and calibration/covariance errors are not established.
3. Review results and limitations
Row-by-row series
Numerical scale ordering
Scale proximity or ordering alone does not identify a physical mode. The figure uses only proton inertial length and perpendicular proton gyroradius in metres.
Uncertainty and robustness remain separate
Export local replay materials
Download analysis.json for complete local replay. Companion files provide editable numbers, the figure, and a fact-only Methods draft. Uploaded rows are never placed in the page URL.
Worked examples
From a plasma state to the scales that matter.
These examples use illustrative parameter sets to show how the core quantities fit together. They are not reconstructions of specific published events.
How to use the examples
Open a state in the calculator, then review every input against the interval, instrument cadence, coordinate system, and species definition used in your analysis.
Scientific evidence
How the calculations are checked
Reference comparisons, analytical relations, units, and applicability limits provide different kinds of support. Software consistency and source identity are checked separately; neither establishes that a physical model applies to a particular observation.
Additional checks
Additional implementation, regression, and provenance checks are documented in the formula audit and public test suite. They detect software changes but do not independently validate a physical model.
Technical validation details
Selected numerical comparisons at stated reference inputs are shown below. The formula audit and public tests retain the complete evidence record, methods, and limitations.
Limits of these checks
Reference values and unit conversions have independent anchors. Analytical relations test stated identities; applicability checks exercise specific implemented boundaries. Fixed regression cases and execution checks detect unintended software changes, but are not independent scientific benchmarks. These checks do not establish model applicability beyond the exercised boundaries or turn reduced formulas, empirical fits, or simplified instability criteria into general kinetic solvers.
Definitions, units, species meanings, and conventions used throughout Alfvenica.
Unit display
Unit-system selectors
Unit choices change how values are displayed; the calculated physical quantities remain the same.
Symbols and meanings
Searchable symbol glossary
Search symbols, names, and common aliases.
Symbol
Name and physical definition
SI and display units
Species and convention
About the project
A transparent formulary for space-plasma work.
Alfvenica is an independent, open-source browser toolkit that brings commonly used space- and astrophysical-plasma calculations together with their units, assumptions, interpretation, and sources. It is intended for researchers, educators, and learners who want to inspect the model behind a number rather than use a black-box result.
Why I built it
I began developing Alfvenica while working with spacecraft observations and kinetic-Alfvén-wave problems. Repeatedly checking units, conventions, assumptions, and limiting cases was often as important as obtaining the numerical result. The toolkit grew from that practical need.
What it is for
Alfvenica combines a searchable calculator, physical interpretation, controlled plotting, illustrative plasma states, explicit model assumptions, primary references, and an in-browser validation report. It supports first-pass estimates, teaching, consistency checks, and transparent methods—not automated wave identification.
Design, units, and privacy
Calculations and plots run locally with explicit unit conventions; input values are not transmitted. Space, SI display, and CGS-oriented mixed choices change how results are shown; the mixed mode is not a complete Gaussian/esu/emu implementation and retains electrical resistivity and conductivity in SI. Each calculator states its assumptions and references.
Scientific basis and validation evidence
Constants cite CODATA 2022, standard coefficient targets cite the 2023 NRL Plasma Formulary, and model-specific entries retain literature references and stated conditions. In-browser checks include independently anchored coefficient comparisons and a unit conversion, alongside analytical, applicability, and numerical consistency checks. Development scaling tests and software integrity checks are documented separately in Validation and the formula audit.
Scope and limitations
Single-ion, scalar-temperature, fluid, reduced two-fluid, bi-Maxwellian, and frozen-flow assumptions appear in several tools. Characteristic scales are usually ordering scales, not sharp universal boundaries. Alfvenica does not replace kinetic dispersion solvers, instrument pipelines, event context, or uncertainty analysis.
AI-assisted development
ChatGPT and Anthropic Claude assisted with software development, documentation, testing, and technical consistency checks. All AI-assisted outputs incorporated into Alfvenica were reviewed and verified by the author against the source code, scientific references, and numerical tests, as applicable.
Collaboration and feedback
Alfvenica is under continuing development. Scientific corrections, independent benchmarks, documentation improvements, code contributions, feedback, and genuine research collaboration are welcome. Report a scientific issue or read the contribution guide.